home.md

@@ -186,7 +186,7 @@ This one almost has a wonderful estimation. Just dec is estimated a bit higher.
 Basically, we can see that：   
 mass_1 is estimated a bit lower than real value.   
 distance is much higher.   
-## (7)VItamin: bilby test  
+## (7)VItamin: bilby BBH waveform test  
 This step is to test VItamin with BBH waveform generated by bilby.   
 The injection parameters are all set as median value of prior's range:    
 > mass_1=57.5     
@@ -197,14 +197,14 @@ The injection parameters are all set as median value of prior's range:
 > ra=3.141592653589793    
 > dec=0.    
    
-Waveform is injected in 3 detectors(L1, H1 and V1), here we plot the one in L1:    
+Waveform is injected in 3 detectors(L1, H1 and V1) with noise, here we plot the one in L1:    
 ![L1_BBH_bilby](uploads/a6499b451955b2afff2560646806c463/L1_BBH_bilby.png)    
 Then whiten it:   
 ![whitened_L1_BBH_bilby](uploads/d89ee0ed55ed37a750f04907c81a8cb9/whitened_L1_BBH_bilby.png)   
 Input the waveform (in 3 detectors) to VItamin, and we get an estimation: 
 ![vitamin_corner_timeseries-0](uploads/278f3e2351bae412a7a63644ccb09f10/vitamin_corner_timeseries-0.png)    
 The posterior doesn't look good, especially theta_jn.    
-What's the problem, is it an error from waveform's amplitude ? Because we can see that this nosiy data's amplitude (in L1) is 10^-22, the whitened one is 10^1.    
+What's the problem, is it an error from waveform's amplitude ? Is it at the right order of magnitude(10^-22)?    
 
 
 # 2.Data