We use spinning BBH template to do PE run on No.5 signal with mass ratio q = 8. Fig.4 and Fig.5 have totally the same parameters and noise, just to verify the stability of Bilby's results. To my surprise, it changes a lot.
We use No.5 signal with mass ratio q = 8, M=150, d=5.
We use spinning BBH template to do PE run. Fig.4 and Fig.5 have totally the same parameters and noise, just to verify the stability of Bilby's results. To my surprise, it changes a lot.
Fig.4 No.5 signal with mass ratio q = 8, random seed = 100.
Fig.4 No.5 signal with mass ratio q = 8, random seed = 100.
First, we produce a high mass BBH signal. m1=89, m2=60, distance=3000, to see how it performs with different noises in Bilby.
First, we produce a high mass BBH signal. m1=89, m2=60, distance=3000, to see how it performs with different noises in Bilby.
As we can see, the posteriors are similar, while there is a little difference. The distance isn't estimated accurately. Fig.4 and Fig.5 have totally the same parameters and noise, just to verify the stability of Bilby's results.
As we can see, the posteriors are similar, while there is a little difference. The distance isn't estimated accurately. Fig.4 and Fig.5 have totally the same parameters and noise, just to verify the stability of Bilby's results.