@@ -111,6 +111,12 @@ JSD of t0 are 0.1732, 0.2894, 0.0110, and 0.0983, for mass ratio of 1, 4, 8 and
...
@@ -111,6 +111,12 @@ JSD of t0 are 0.1732, 0.2894, 0.0110, and 0.0983, for mass ratio of 1, 4, 8 and
In my opinion, these four JSD values don't have an obvious distance from the BBH JSD distribution. Remember in the previous test, a big difference between BBH and BH encounter posterior is BH encounter has double peaks on t0. However, new injected BBH (using BH encounter peak values) also have double peaks on t0 expect m4. This makes me confusing.
In my opinion, these four JSD values don't have an obvious distance from the BBH JSD distribution. Remember in the previous test, a big difference between BBH and BH encounter posterior is BH encounter has double peaks on t0. However, new injected BBH (using BH encounter peak values) also have double peaks on t0 expect m4. This makes me confusing.
Therefore, I think it may work if we perform more this kind of tests. We have 100 random noise, but only used one for each BH encounter waveform already.
Therefore, I think it may work if we perform more this kind of tests. We have 100 random noise, but only used one for each BH encounter waveform already.
Then I used 100 detector noises for JSD calculation. I calculated JSD for three parameters: m1, m2, and t0.
For each parameter, there are three kinds of JSD.
The first one is called BBH reference, which is JSD between two BBHs with different detector noise.
The second one is called BH encounter VS BBH reference, which is JSD between BH encounter and BBH with the same detector noise.
The third one is called BH encounter VS injected BBH, which is JSD between BH encounter, and BBH injected by peak values of BH encounter's posterior, with the same detector noise.
Here is the script which shows all JSD calculation. Plots can be seen from line 63.
